[03-JUL-19] We use assembly number A2089 for a family of medium-voltage power supplies and amplifiers that drive piezo-electric (PZ) actuators. In particular, we are focused on tube actuators that bend when we apply voltages to four longitudinal quadrant electrodes. Our plan is to mount a rigid support pipe in the end of the PZ tube, run an optical fiber through the tube and the pipe, and so use the PZ tube to move the fiber tip around. With such fiber positioners arranged in the focal plane of a telescope, we can hope to align a large number of fibers with separate galaxy images, and so obtain their spectra simultaneously.
The PT230.94 has a 500-μm wall thickness. Four quadrant electrodes are distributed around the outer radius, and one electrode on the inner radius. The permitted drive voltage for each outer electrode with respect to the inner electrode is ±250 V. The above figure shows the deflection that results from +250 V applied to one side and −250 V applied to the other.
|Fiber Spacing||5 mm||spacing between fibers in a square grid array|
|Fill Factor||π/4 = 79%||fraction of array area accessible to at least one fiber tip|
|Positioning Accuracy||20 μm||absolute accuracy of fiber center placement|
|Positioning Time||100 s||time to re-locate all fibers with specified accuracy|
|Fiber Holder Diameter||1 mm||the diameter of the tube holding the fiber|
|Power Dissipation||10 mW/fiber||the dissipation in the local drive electronics|
Our objective is to build a fiber-optic positioning system meeting the above specification. On a 500-mm square focal plane, we would be able to place ten thousand fibers. A 1-m focal plane will provide fifty thousand fibers. All piezo-tubes are driven continuously by a constant voltage that dictates and maintains its fiber position. Piezo crystals themselves present a resistance of hundreds of GΩ, so their inherent current consumption when they are doing no work is tens of nanoamps. The circuit below is an example of a slow, low-power driver for a piezo-tube electrode.
To driver the four quadrants of a single piezo-tube, we use a digital to analog converter (DAC) such as the DAC104S085, which provides four twelve-bit outputs at a cost of 1.1 mW current consumption from 3.3 V. In the above circuit, we have the 0-3.3 V DAC output C on the base of Q1. The current I1 will be roughly (C−0.6)R1, or 0.0-1.0 μA. This current passes through R2 and D1, setting the base voltage of Q2 with respect to +250 V, and giving rise to I2 of 0.0-5.0 μA. This current passes through a 100-M&Ohm; resistor to −250 V, so that the voltage at P varies from −250 V to +250 V as we vary C from 0.6 V to 3.3 V. The maximum power dissipation of the circuit is 5 μA × 500 V = 2.5 mW. We plan for opposite electrodes to be driven with opposite voltages, so the power dissipation for the East-West electrodes will be 2.5 mW for all positions, and for North-South another 2.5 mW. Add to this the 1.1 mW of the DAC and another 0.2 mW for a micropower logic chip such as the LCMXO2-1200ZE, the maximum power dissipation per piezo-tube should be around 6 mW, so we are shooting for 10 mW/fiber to give us some room for error.
The capacitance between a PT230.94 piezo-tube electrode and the grounded inner electrode is around 3 nF. With a 5-μA charging current, the voltage across this capacitance will vary at 1700 V/s. If the piezo-tube has to move a 1-g mass a distance of 1 mm vertically, it will need a total of 10 μJ of energy, which a 1-μA current will supply in one second even if the voltage across the piezo crystal is only 10 V. The above circuit is both powerful enough and fast enough to support movement of the fibers to a new position in less than a few seconds.
[17-JUL-19] The A2089A is a static piezo-electric driver consisting of a ±250 V power supply and two hand-operated multi-turn potentiometers to set each of the two output drive voltages to a value −250-+250V.
The circuit is powered by 24 V delivered through two banana jacks. Two VG1524S250 isolated DC-DC converters produce +250V and −250V from the 24-V input.
The ±250-V voltages are higher than we are used to working with in an open-frame circuit. We touched the +250-V and −250-V power supplies with one finger, while holding a ground terminal with the other hand, and felt only a slight sensation. To make sure that the outputs are safe for use without special precautions, they are presented to banana sockets through 100-kΩ resistors. The resistors limit the current through the human body to less than 2.5 mA. A typical hand-to-hand resistance in the body is 100 kΩ. Such a body resistance would pass no more than 1.2 mA from the R or L outputs, dissipating roughly 100 mW of power.
The A2089A allows us to connect ±250 V to two opposite electrodes on a PZ tube and so cause static displacement of a fiber pipe glued into the tube.
[18-JUL-19] The A2089B provides two inverting amplifiers with output dynamic range ±250 V. Each amplifier has gain −25. We connect two function generator signals to LIN and RIN and so obtain two amplified signals a LOUT and ROUT respectively. Signals are brought to and from the board with vertical BNC sockets. Power for the amplifier comes from a 24-V power adaptor with 5.5-mm center-positive plug.
The ±250-V power supply is produced by two VG1524S250. Amplification is provided by the PA95U high-voltage power operational amplifier. The exposed metal backs of the two amplifiers U1 and U2 are connected to their output ports, so avoid touching these when the output signal is large. The A2089B draws roughly 200 mA from its 24-V power supply.
The A208901A printed circuit board has two errors. One is an inversion of the footprint for L1 and L2, which we get around by mounting the two converters on the bottom side of the board. The other is a reversal of the connections to P1. We correct this reversal by cutting tracks and adding wire links.
We apply a 1-Vpp sinusoid and a 10-Vpp sinusoid to RIN and observe the amplitude of ROUT. For the 10-Vpp input, we see slew-rate limiting of the output starting at around 20 kHz. The PA95U has a typical slew rate of 30 V/μs with a 4.7-pF compensation capacitor. We are using 10 pF and we see a 20 V/μs maximum slew rate.
[14-AUG-19] The A2089B2 is a modification of the A2089B where R1 = 130 kΩ so that the gain of the U1 amplifier from P2 to P3 is −1. We connect a signal to RIN. We connect ROUT to LIN. Now we see RIN multilied by +25 at LOUT and −25 at ROUT. Thus the A2089B2 provides complimentary drive output for two PZ electrodes using one signal.
We use a BNC-T on the ROUT socket so as to share it between the PZ electrode and LIN. We connect ×10 oscilloscope probes to the output resistors of both the left and right channels so as to view the output signals.
[12-AUG-19] The A2089C provides two complimentary ±250-V outputs generated from one ±10-V input. The OUT+ signal is +25 times the input, the OUT&minus: signal is −25 times the input. The driver allows us to generate the complimentary East-West or North-South drive voltages for a PZ tube, such as the PT230.94, from a single input signal.
The A2089C printed circuit board (the A208901B) provides an extension with six footprints designed for solder-mounting of six PT230.94. Each footprint is supplied with the same east, west, north, and south drive voltages from four BNC sockets.
The A2089C amplifiers are identical to those of the A2089B, except one is connected with gain −1 to the output of the first amplifier, thus producing the gain of +25 to compliment the first amplifier's gain of −25.
[12-SEP-19] We load connectors and standoffs onto a PZ Support Plate and solder a PZ actuator with steel tube into one of the PZ footprints. We injure a thumb pressing upon the ±250 V test points on the amplifier board. When the two points are close enough, the current through the skin is significant and causes nerve damage. We cover the test points with kapton tape.
When we apply complimentary 1-Hz 250-V amplitude sine waves to the East-West electrodes, we see the tip of our 300-mm long, 1.25-mm diameter steel tube, which is soldered into the tip of the PZ tube, moving with a peak-to-peak amplitude of around 1.4 mm.
As we increase the frequency from 1 Hz, the amplitude of the movement increases until we appear to arrive at a resonance at around 12 Hz, where the peak-to-peak movement of the fiber tip starts to exceed 30 mm and we turn off the excitation voltage. Above 12 Hz, the amplitude reduces.
[13-SEP-19] We consider how important is the range of motion of the optical fiber tip as compared to the spacing of the fibers in an array. Our prototype array has a two-dimensional 5-mm spacing, and the range of motion of the fiber is 1.4 mm. Suppose we focus a region of the sky onto a rectangular plane of width b and height a. We place in this rectangle our array of optical fibers. Each fiber can move in a circle of diameter d, and the centers of these circles are arranged in a two-dimensional array of spacing w. Thus there are a total of ab/w2 fibers in the image rectangle.
Within the image rectangle we suppose there are n celestial objects arranged at random. We ignore the fact that some may be too close together to distinguish with a fiber of finite diameter. Any object within the range of motion of a fiber may be viewed by that fiber.
We prepare a simulation program, Observing.tcl, a TclTk script we can run in the LWDAQ Toolmaker. The simulation begins by plotting the n objects as black dots to indicate that they have not yet been observed. We place the center of top-left fiber's range at the top-left corner of the image rectangle. We go through all the fiber circles and pick one unobserved object to observe, and mark it as red to show it has been observed. If not unobserved object exists in the fiber range, the fiber makes no observation.
We repeat this procedure, but now we displace the center of the top-left fiber range by one half the diameter of the range to the right. In subsequent exposures, we continue to displace to the left, and then downwards, so as to move the fiber range in a regular pattern that covers all locations. After each observation, we record the fraction of the n objects that have been observed. We plot this fraction versus the number of exposures. We do this for various values of d/w.
To observe 90% of the available objects, it takes 10 exposures with d/w = 1.2 or 1.4, and 11 exposures with d/w = 0.8 or 1.0. With d/w = 0.6 it takes 13 exposures. For lower ratios, the number of exposures required increases rapidly. The fact that the performance for a ratio of 0.8 equals that of 1.0 we suspect is an artifact of the way we are displacing the fiber array.
We try another algorithm for displacing the fiber array between exposures. Before each observation, we place the fiber array at random, with the top-left fiber somewhere in a square of side w at the top-left corner of the image rectangle. We obtain our plots of observed fraction versus number of exposures for various ratios of fiber range to fiber spacing. We find that random translation gives better performance for ratio 1.0, which suggests our regular translation is flawed.
When we have an average of 10 objects in each square the size of one fiber spacing, the number of exposures required to observe 90% of objects is 10 for fiber range 1.2 times the spacing, and 13 for fiber range only 0.6 times the spacing. There is no advantage gained when we increase the range to 1.4 times the spacing.
[17-SEP-19] We measure the gain versus frequency of our first A2089C, shown below.
[23-SEP-19] We have two PT230.94 tubes joined together with wires soldered to their electrodes, making a 60-mm tube. We have a 1.25-mm diameter, 300-mm long steel tube glued into the top end of the top tube. The bottom of the bottom tube is soldered to one of our support plates. We apply ±250 V complimentary 1-Hz sinusoids to the East-West electrodes and take the following movie of the tip of the fiber.
By comparing the movement of the tube to its diameter as seen in the video, we deduce that the center of the tube is moving a total of 5.0 mm, or 100% of the fiber spacing.
[08-OCT-19] We consider the deflection of the end of our fiber guide tube when it is horizontal, as shown in the derivation below.
Using the above result, we obtain the following deflections for two varieties of stainless steel tube available from MicroGroup, and a hypothetical carbon fiber tube.
The carbon fiber is almost as stiff as steel, but is only one fifth as dense. Carbon fiber tubes deflect by one quarter the distance of steel tubes of the same dimensions. But it is not possible to make carbon fiber tubes with walls as thin as a the steel tubes listed in the table above. In the derivation below, we show that the deflection of a thin-walled tube is independent of the wall thickness.
Given two tubes of the same outer diameter, one of carbon fiber and the other of steel, the thinner wall of the steel tube reduces the advantage of carbon fiber over steel to a factor of three reduction in deflection.